Robert J. Steinfeld, “Assets and you may Suffrage in early Western Republic,” Stanford Laws Review 41, zero. dos (January 1989): 356, 364; Nancy F. Cott, “Relationships and you may Women’s Citizenship in the us, 1830–1934,” American Historical Review 103, zero. 5 (December 1998): 1451–1454.
The women who composed this new anti-suffrage petition so you’re able to Congress penned they on the editorial profiles out of Godey’s Lady’s Book and Magazine, a greatest monthly periodical notorious because of its strategy regarding just what historians keeps titled “the fresh cult of domesticity,” so you can garner tens of thousands of signatures for its speech to Congress
Stephanie McCurry, “The 2 Confronts out of Republicanism: Gender and you can Proslavery Government when you look at the Antebellum South carolina,” Diary away from American Background 78, no. 4 (February 1992): 1252–1259, 1263–1264.
William J. Novak, “New Judge Sales out-of Citizenship when you look at the Nineteenth-Century The usa,” when you look at the T the guy Popular Feel: The new Guidelines within the American Governmental Record , ed. Novak, and Julian E. Zelizer (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Push, 2003), 93–98, 105–112.
Ellen Carol DuBois, “Outgrowing the latest Lightweight of Fathers: Equal Liberties, Woman suffrage, and the You Structure, 1820–1878,” Diary away from American Records 74, zero. step 3 ( Winkler, “A revolution Too soon: Woman Suffragists and also the ‘Traditions Structure,’” Ny University Legislation Feedback 76, no. 5 (2001): 1456–1526.
Faye Elizabeth. Dudden, Assaulting Opportunity: The newest Struggle more than Woman suffrage and you can Black colored Suffrage from inside the Repair America (New york: Oxford University Drive, 2011), 124; on anti-suffragists from inside the Arizona, DC, get a hold of Susan E. Marshall, Splintered Sisterhood: Gender and you will Category from the Strategy against Woman suffrage (Madison: University away from Wisconsin Drive, 1997) , 19–23.
The newest petitioners had been culturally and politically influential women. Phelps don’t sign the petition, however, she publicized they and most likely place they to possess guide during the Godey’s. Partnered anti-suffrage feminine tend to then followed this new culture to be acknowledged by Mrs. [partner’s complete name], a personal summit one to mirrored coverture, nearest and dearest ancestry, and you will public updates. Almira Lincoln Phelps, “Female’s Legal rights: An earnest Movement in opposition to the new Extension of the Suffrage-Target into the Women of the country,” Nyc Times, February twenty seven, 1871; Marshall, Splintered Sisterhood, 20; “A Uniform Splitting up Rules-Brand new Movement with the Anti-Suffrage Woman,” Chicago Tribune, November 2, 1871; Age Cady Stanton, Susan Brownell Anthony, and Matilda Joslyn Gage, eds., History of Woman-suffrage, vol. 3, 1861–1876 (New york: Fowler & Better, 1882), 494–495; With the petitions and remonstrances, find Susan Zaeske, Signatures regarding Citizenship: Petitioning, Antislavery, and you will Women’s Governmental Term (Church Mountain: College or university regarding North carolina Press, 2003) Г–zbekistan kadД±nlar istiyorum amerikan erkek arkadaЕџД±.
Caroline Fairchild Corbin, Characters out of a fireplace-Corner: An excellent Plea to own Natural Hopes and Polite Connections anywhere between Men and you can Female (Chicago: Fergus, 1886), cited inside the Report off Senate Look for Panel to your Woman-suffrage inside the “Views of your Fraction” [so you can Praise S. Res. 5], 49th Cong., 2nd sess., S. Rept. 70, step 1 (April 30, 1886); Rix, “Gender and you will Reconstitution,” 89.
Congressional Listing, 47th Cong., first sess., 229 (1881), cited from inside the Siegel, “She individuals,” 1001. John Tyler Morgan try a former Confederate brigadier standard, an excellent descendant off President John Tyler from Virginia, and you may an architect from light supremacy in Alabama. Discover Encyclopedia out of Alabama .
Meg Jacobs, William J
Siegel, “She people,” 1000n160, 1003; to the “redemption of one’s Northern,” look for Keyssar, Directly to Vote, 96–138. Because Keyssar notes, because of the middle-1870s, a significant number regarding societal intellectuals and politicians lamented the new use off common dick suffrage regarding aftermath of the Municipal Conflict, in the midst of profile out of Reconstruction’s downfalls plus the rise away from immigration, industrialization, brand new governmental servers, and you can change moves. Looking for it impracticable so you can restrict cock suffrage, north rivals away from democracy turned in order to managing the frequency, actions, and range off political inquiries in local and you will county elections and you will enacting voter membership statutes to manage the new electorate. A northern and western version regarding southern disfranchisement, these processes off cutting democratic involvement and direct symbolization arrived lower than increasing scrutiny regarding 1890s–1910s, fueling not only Populism and woman-suffrage included in a more impressive reform coalition.