Since Zelizer notes, taboos can be found facing sex for hire
Sweden, based in north European countries, is home to ten mil people, therefore it is probably the most populated nation within the Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and you can Sweden) as well as in new European Nordic Region (Scandinavia and additionally Finland and you may Iceland). While it began with the new later 1990s, Sweden turned the global frontrunner from the fight against prostitution, deciding to make the nation prominent from the literature and you can discussion regarding sex functions.
Inside chapter, I establish the Swedish design have diffused throughout the world. I give an explanation for rules (which is today twenty years dated) together with feminist thought that served the original legislation. Then i summarize the 3 ages ot fieldwork which i carried call at Sweden. step 1 interviewed several trick informants (societal experts, activists, a counselor, and you will good sexologist) in two of one’s around three major Swedish towns and cities (Stockholm and you may Malmo), as well as in Oslo (Norway) and you can Helsinki (Finland) evaluate various countries and you may options. The finish summarizes the main abilities ot my look.
It is important to understand the environment in Sweden with respect to research on pros- titution/sex works. This issue is so sensitive that it seems impossible for the average person to have a neutral approach to it. Everyone must stand in favor of or against the legislation. And the words used to frame the discussions matter a great deal. The Swedish law uses the terms prostitution and prostitute, not sex work and sex worker. The government and those who support the legislation use the word prostitution, while those who wish to overturn the legislation use the term sex employee. For example, Swedish government institutions, such as local authorities and health services providers, use the word prostitution, but the two Swedish associations that fight tor the rights of the country’s sex workers (Fuckforbundet and Rose Alliance; see Figures 31.1 and 31.2) use the term sex performs. 1 learned from my fieldwork that using the correct words with the people who live and work in Sweden is important. Indeed, some social workers or activists refused to read this talk with me because 1 used the “wrong” word with them; because the legislation is so controversial, few people believe that you are a neutral researcher who wants to study prostitution or sex work from an academic point of view. Attempting to
Contour 30.1 Individuals with reddish umbrellas (symbolic of the newest sex workers’ liberties direction) with the Fuckforbundet drifts within the EuroPride Procession into the Stockholm to the .
Knowing the effects of the Swedish rules towards existence as well as on the work from male sex pros, 1 interviewed twenty-five male sex professionals who do work inside Sweden
be as neutral as possible, some researchers and social workers have used the term sex getting payment. Unfortunately, the phrase just sounds awkward to those who hear it and who want to know your position on the issue.
To maintain a neutral position, in this chapter 1 use both terms, in alphabetical order with a slash in between: prostitution /sex works or prostitute/sex staff. Before exploring the details of the Swedish legislation, it is important to understand the feminists thought that has framed the prostitution/sex work debate.
Shape 29.dos Brand new Fuckforbundet floats off a street-level look at for the EuroPride Procession into the Stockholm on the . Sex experts and you may partners towards floats monitor the assistance getting sex workers’ liberties in Sweden.
Due to space limitations, I offer two key elements of the debate: the different ideas regarding prostitution/sex work (as presented by Zelizer, 2005) and feminist thought on this topic (Scou- lar, 2004). The aim of Zelizer s book, The purchase out-of Intimacy, is to analyze “the relationship between everyday practices and legal disputes when it comes to intimate economic interactions” (p. 1). It is commonly believed that “intimacy corrupts economy and the economy corrupts intimacy. Yet . . . people often mingle economic activity with intimacy. The two often sustain each other” (p. 1).